Former South Carolina Attorney General Charlie Condon assesses Becky Hill’s guilty plea as insufficient to overturn Alex Murdaugh’s murder conviction, citing juror testimonies that largely dismiss her influence. Hill, the ex-Colleton County clerk, pleaded guilty to perjury, obstruction of justice, and misconduct in office for actions like sharing sealed exhibits and book promotion, receiving three years probation. The South Carolina Supreme Court is set to hear Murdaugh’s appeal arguments on February 11, 2026.​​
Juror Testimonies
Eleven of twelve jurors testified under oath that Hill’s actions did not impact their verdicts. Juror Z initially claimed Hill’s comments influenced her but later affirmed her affidavit citing pressure from other jurors, a common jury dynamic not grounds for appeal. A prior judge ruled Hill’s remarks “fleeting and foolish” but insufficient to alter the outcome.​
Legal Outlook
Condon views Hill’s misconduct as the defense’s weakest argument, requiring proof of actual prejudice or probable jury impact, which evidence lacks. He anticipates the Supreme Court affirming the verdicts, noting no jury tampering charges against Hill. Defense may gain more traction challenging financial crime evidence admission as motive.
